Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > the think tank > news releases > Council Report Urges U.S. to Prepare for Post-Mugabe Zimbabwe
| Author: | Michelle D. Gavin, Adjunct Fellow for Africa |
|---|
November 7, 2007
Council on Foreign Relations
November 7, 2007 – Economic mismanagement, endemic corruption, and violent repression of political opposition under President Robert Mugabe’s long reign have left Zimbabwe with hyperinflation, an 80% unemployment rate, and severe food, fuel, and power shortages. With upcoming elections in March 2008, a new Council Special Report Planning for Post-Mugabe Zimbabwe says that now is the time to redirect policy toward Zimbabwe.
“The human rights and humanitarian consequences of these developments have attracted the attention of the United States and others in the international community,” prompting an opportunity for action, asserts the report. “Sound recovery and reconstruction planning can…help the United States and others to prevent the worst-case scenarios of civil conflict, state collapse, and regional destabilization from taking hold during attempted political transition,” says the report.
Report author Michelle D. Gavin, international affairs fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, argues that focusing on the future can change the calculus of important Zimbabwean players in the present and possibly hasten Mugabe’s exit. “Having been unable to stop Zimbabwe’s slide into crisis, the United States has a much better chance of being effective in helping to point to a way forward for the country—one that might galvanize influential Zimbabweans into action by making plain that there will be tangible benefits associated with reform.”
But effecting change requires a multilateral approach as there are limits to U.S. interests and influence in Zimbabwe. “By working multilaterally to build consensus around governance-related conditions for reengagement, and by marshaling significant reconstruction resources in an international trust fund for Zimbabwe, the United States can help establish clear incentives for potential successors to Mugabe to embrace vital reforms,” says the report.
Although “Zimbabweans …will be the drivers for any foreseeable change,” the report maintains that the benefits of a new strategy might extend beyond Zimbabwe. “The United States can seize on the opportunity presented by change in Zimbabwe to enter a new phase of cooperation with southern Africa, and particularly to improve a somewhat strained relationship with South Africa…. South Africa’s influence as a leader in the global south and importance as a partner in counterterrorism efforts, make the U.S.-South Africa relationship among the most important in the region,” says the report.
The report, produced by the Council’s Center for Preventive Action, stresses three vital elements in any multilateral reconstruction effort.
“Zimbabwe, with its tremendous national potential and current compelling roster of civil society leaders who have worked tirelessly and at great personal risk to resist oppression, lends itself to the American desire to see success stories emerge in Africa that are grounded in democratic governance and respect for the rule of law,” concludes the report.
Explore the international finance regime with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
